[MD] SOLAQI, Kant's TITs, chaos, and the S/I distinction

[Heather Perella]

     [SA previously]
> >      What do you mean by self-spovs?

     [Marsha]
> This is from Lila's Child:
> "The MOQ, as I understand it, denies any existence
> of a "self" that is independent..."
> (Annotation 29., pp.64-65)
> Then when trying to figure out if thoughts are
> intellect or social 
> level, one expects the self...


     A HA!  I see.  thanks.  The tendency to rely upon
a self outside of these patterns is to only go where
dq exists.  Yet, dq can't say anything about these
patterns.  Dq doesn't say anything.  So, the effort to
objectify, to go outside of these patterns to reflect
back upon them is an effort that pulls away from
static patterns into nothing.  What we will find is
nothing, and the effort to step outside of little self
is only to run away from ourselves, an effort to jump
out of our skin and bones to look back at them without
dying.  Our mind would leave us - that's insane.


     [Marsha]
> Mark Maxwell recently wrote this:  "The MoQ says:
> Social patterns are 
> imitated, Intellectual patterns are
> manipulated."

     thanks.  I'm satisfied with this.

     [Marsha]
> I remind myself to kiss deeply (kiss = keep it
> simple stupid)  <-me.


     And this is where quiet is present.  Quiet is
simple.


another wave of clouds,
SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com