[MD] Dawkins a Materialist

[David M]

Hi Case

Yes and no. Some of these guys raise valid
gaps in current theories, but their solution
looks fairly useless if they are talking about
some kind of design archetect. But what about
intelligence in nature, this is a more interesting
issue, an alternative to the many worlds problem
is the idea that consciousness actively determines
what possible world becomes actual. See Amit Goswami
on this subject for example.

David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Case" <Case at iSpots.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Dawkins a Materialist


> [David M]
> You wanted to avoid Behe I thought.
>
> I am always a bit suspicious of ruling people out of the discussion on 
> some
> because they are not playing by the usual rules, including rules of style.
>
> [Case]
> Personally I seek out the opinions of those I disagree with from Limbaugh
> and Hannity to Moody Radio. They all have their place but intelligent
> design's place is in pew not the science class room.
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>