[MD] SOLAQI, Kant's TITs, chaos, and the S/I distinction

[david buchanan]

Ian glendinning said to dmb:
Yes, I'm make a virtue out of lack of clarity, in a sense. It's not possible 
for everything to be clear at the same time, it then becomes a matter of 
what it's important to be clear about in different situations, and of course 
that's when we make mistakes, me inlcuded.

dmb says:
For Pete's sake! You're willing to take the equivocating weasle position 
even about something as basic as clarity? In this context, when is clarity 
NOT important? What topic ISN'T served by clarity? In what world does it 
make sense to say that a lack of clarity is a virtue? These are rhetorical 
questions, of course, with the point being that your assertions are, as 
usual, preposterous nonsense. It's pure drivel and there is nothing virtuous 
about it. Quite the opposite.

_________________________________________________________________
Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page 
www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701