[MD] A Cup of Intellect

Stephen Hannon stevehannon at gmail.com
Fri Jan 5 15:26:08 PST 2007


Hi Ant and Ian,

[Ant]
I disagree.  I'd rather have a few high quality, well edited posts on this
Discussion group rather than an avalanche of middle-of-the-road,
off-the-top-of-the-head ramblings which often appear here with little
editing of previous posts.  The latter rarely add any valuable insight to
the MOQ and, in the end, just become a drag to go through.

[Steve H]
I agree with Ant on this point.  High-quality posts are like high-quality
tea.  Both are enjoyed thoroughly, and their low-quality counterparts
are quickly thrown in the trash.  Although I think it is human nature to
hold on to your own ideas.  Value rigidity, as its called in ZMM.  I wonder
value rigidity is so prevalent in spite of Intellectual Quality being
the highest
level.  Is there any particular reason why it is so common for people to
fight Dynamic Quality in this regard?

Random thoughts,
Steve H

> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list