[MD] Dawkins a Materialist
david buchanan
dmbuchanan at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 5 15:51:08 PST 2007
Ian said:
I guess my overly aggressive tone was really aimed at DMB who repeatedly
refuses to accept that science is "just" a belief system too, and others in
our audience who do not see as you do (and say DM and I do) that "science"
is no longer the simple causal objective system it was 100 years ago.
dmb says:
When did I ever say, or even imply, that science is a "simple causal
objective system"? When did I ever refuse to accept that science is a belief
system? Never, that's when. As we all know, scientific objectivity is one of
Pirsig's central targets. My repeated point is simply that scientific
beliefs are not based on faith. Yes, science uses assumptions and starting
points. Yes, scientifc beliefs are beliefs. I'm just saying that those
assumptions and beliefs are not based on faith, but on evidence. Your whole
case seems to be predicated on the notion that "faith" and "assumption" mean
the same thing, but they don't. The assumptions of science are used and
tested and modified continuously but faith-based beliefs run screaming from
such scrutiny. How can you fail to see the difference? If the assumptions of
science were immune to criticism the way religious dogma has been, then
Pirsig could not have proposed an alternative and we wouldn't be able to
discuss it, but he did and we do.
Or think about it this way. The scientific method is basically just a formal
procedure designed to carefully examine certain kinds of experience.
Traditionally, because of the assumptions of SOM, sensory experience was the
only kind that counted. Pirsig alters this narrow conception of what counts
and experience and so alters what counts as valid empirical evidence. But
the principle remains the same. Great value is still placed on the idea that
knowledge begins in experience and that it can be tested by experience. This
does not destroy science, it improves it. This does not deny the superiority
of rationality over traditional beleifs, it expands the notion of
rationality. These modifications make it much harder to exclude mystical
experience, but it does NOT put faith-based or untested beliefs on equal
footing with evidence, rationality, science or anything of the sort.
Thanks
dmb
_________________________________________________________________
Find sales, coupons, and free shipping, all in one place! MSN Shopping
Sales & Deals
http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctid=198,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200639
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list