[MD] ART versus NONART
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Wed Jan 10 00:28:02 PST 2007
Greetings,
Re: Art versus Nonart: Art out of Mind (Contemporary Artists and
their Critics) (Hardcover)
by Tsion Avital, John G. Harries (Translator)
Thanks for the recommendation Ham!
I am only through the first chapter, but I'm finding this an
extremely interesting and challenging book: Art is as dead as that
small teal (duck) in ZMM. I've included a quote below, chosen only
because it uses a water analogy. But I'm really upset that this book
should cost $90. It seems to me this book should be published in
monthly installments in People magazine or as a comic book. How can
anyone blame society when they're fed crap and the elites restrict
access to the good stuff?
The Interlibrary Loan system is great, but I might need to have this
book as a reference with marginalia and it's too expensive. Damn!!!
m
Quote:
"The problem of demarcation created for the first time a
situation in which everything, including nothing, may be accepted as
a work of art. But then there is not differentiation between the
class of entities that belong to the category of art and those that
do not belong to that category. The significance of this fact is
that in these conditions there is no art, nor can there be
any. Similarly, if everything is water, and there is nothing that is
not water, then there is no meaning to water, for there is no way of
distinguishing a duality or difference between water and
nonwater. That is to say, if any thing can be art, than there is no art.
This conclusion follows from a basic and most important attribute
of symbols of every kind. Every symbol, whether verbal or pictorial,
connects all entities that have a certain common denominator and at
the same time separates them from all others entities in the
world. This attribute is what makes symbols of all kinds a means of
classification and ordering. (ART versus NONART,pp56-57)
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list