[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

[Case]

> [Case]
> The fact that life is a product of inorganic processes is just too well
> established to even argue about. You need to just get used to that or get
> used having people looking at you funny when you burst out like that.
> "...takes the livingness of life away..." that's fucking funny.

[Platt]
What "inorganic processes" are you referring to? The one's scientists
haven't been able to duplicate perhaps? Or the ones you know must exist as a
matter of faith?

[Case]
I was using "inorganic" is the artificial and incorrect usage assigned to it
in the MoQ. That is, non-biological. If you want to insist on a proper
definition of inorganic as non-carbon based processes I will happily
rephrase my statements. The processes I refer to are ones that scientists
understand and manipulate and reproduce all of the time. 

I have stated many, many items that I have faith in what they are doing.