[MD] Intention changes physical world (some questions)

[David M]

Hi

Of course ought implies there is a choice.
Only when circumstances are open, when there
are possibilities to select between are there choices
or oughts. If contingency is ubiquitous then maybe
the whole cosmos has been a matter of choice.
This may not mean a unified divine process of
selection. Maybe there has been a great army
of selectors? And maybe this army has had to feel
its way step by step, making as good a quality decision
as it could take. An electron is surely not conscious like
a human being (it lacks a few levels and layers of SQ
that people have) but maybe an electron finds a quality
orbit to suit the sort of electron it 'wants to be', rejecting
lower quality orbits that arepossible but not 'desired'.Funny thing
is quantum mechanics comes close to talking like this.
And as this is only a way of describing 'behaviour' who is
to say whether there is choice or law or mechanism
or desire or natural selection or love or the id or SQ or
social convention or whatever at work. Only clue we have...
what we experience as the reality of existing.

Ta
David M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Case" <Case at iSpots.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Intention changes physical world (some questions)


> [x]
> Question: do you see "ought" as quality?
>
> [Case]
> Ought might describe what we would think a quality future would be like be 
> I
> am not sure how far I would push that.
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>