[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Tue Jan 16 13:14:53 PST 2007
[Arlo]
So while organization (or collective activity, or even
"organisation" :-)) on a lower level gives rise to upper level
patterns, it is not a planned, deliberate activity to do so.
[Dave M]
how do you know that?
[Arlo]
Because, if for no other reason, proposing the reverse leads to a
world that does not jibe with experience.
From LILA, "But it's as foolish to think of a city or a society as
created by human bodies as it is to think of human bodies as a
creation of the cells, or to think of cells as created by protein and
DNA molecules, or to think of DNA as created by carbon and other
inorganic atoms. If you follow that fallacy long enough you come out
with the conclusion that individual electrons contain the
intelligence needed to build New York City all by themselves.
Absurd." (LILA, 217-218)
For a cell to conceive of a "brain", and conceive of its function, in
order to design and build the brain, it would have to possess at
least as equally a powerful "brain" to begin with.
In other words, to say "let's get together and form a brain that can
manipulate complex symbols and engage in abstract thought", would
require those individual cells to possess brains that can manipulate
complex symbols and engage in abstract thought.
It would also require a cell to have an awareness of distance and
motion beyond itself for a cell to conceive of, and design, "feet and
legs", not to mention the ability to symbolically represent these
processes and activities _before_ the brain and legs were designed.
Plus, are you suggesting that only past cells had this ability to
preplan and create bodies according to some blueprint, but now modern
cells are automated and don't? Or are you suggesting that each
reproductive iteration involves groups of cells sitting around and
deciding to "make on more like we've been" or "try something new"?
Finally, do you think the cells also predesign cities and buildings?
Or did the cells just get together and decide to build a "human
consciousness" but then have no control over what that
"consciousness" does? If not, how were they able to plan on making
something so complex?
To clarify, the cells each follow "what is best", and in doing so
form collectives that function increasingly like "individuals" in
their own right.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list