[MD] The SOL-ution

[Heather Perella]

     [Bo]
> The fallacy of an Essence or a Quality
> that can be arbitrary split stems from diagrams
beginning
> with the motorcycle (ZMM p. 93) divided into
> "components/functions". 
> Here the MC obviously stands there unscathed, but no
> Reality remains after the initial cut.    

     By arbitrary split, do you mean adverse to this
original dynamic/static split?

     [Bo]
> As said Essence=Reality is perfect with me. I may
> even agree with you about "Quality an S/O appraisal"
because
> Pirsig abandoned Phaedrus' insight and made Quality
a mere
> S/O subset.

     Please elaborate on how Quality became "...a mere
S/O subset."  I thought the MoQ, the Q is Quality,
thus, Quality=Reality.

thanks.

blue cracks in this sky,
SA

 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile.  Get started!
http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail