[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Fri Jan 19 10:01:04 PST 2007
Ian,
If it were Goddess rather than God under consideration there would be
no discussion. The concept would have been ridiculed and the
religion destroyed centuries ago.
Marsha
At 12:33 PM 1/19/2007, you wrote:
>Excellent Mark,
>You said
>
> > You call it Quality, we call it God. Only when there are enough of 'You' as
> > a social entity will the term God be replaced with Quality. It's
> not a matter
> > of Intellect but a matter of Social force. God is the ruling celebrity and
> > until this changes it will remain thus.
>
>What things are called is indeed social, and the only way that social
>process can be changed is by intellect, MoQish intellect naturally.
>The catch we seem to be struggling with is that any kind of intellect
>needs to be "socialised", unless it is given some "elite authority"
>simply by virtue of being intellectual.
>
>A knotty one.
>Can we ever "socialise" the precision needed ?
>
>Ian
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list