[MD] Formalising the Code of Art (Rekindling with SA)

[Heather Perella]

     [David H.]
> Yes.  But I'm not sure if I'm comfortable with your
> terminology of 'overlap'.  It is dangerous. DQ is
not some thing to
> overlap.


     I agree with you that saying sq=dq is dangerous,
very dangerous indeed.  If somebody doesn't fully
understand how this is (sq=dq), then the terminology
loses its' polarity.  Yet, eventually, isn't it this
polarity that is to be not opposing magnets as in
negative and positive pushing each other away. 
Another danger is to have dq somewhere 'out-there'
beyond experience, like a heaven we can't touch where
the gods live.  So, two dangers.  One is not truly
understanding how sq=dq, and the other dq is divided
from sq in reality, forever, where dq is the place of
gods so to speak.


     [David H.]
> Same DQ as a dog?  I can see that your making a
> point, and it is an  
> important one.  For everything must have come from
> DQ.  But it is  
> dangerous.  Strictly speaking, within the MOQ dog is
> not DQ, dog is  
> sq.  I realise your making a point but if we are to
> say something  
> meaningful it should be correct.

     Strictly speaking, you are correct.  Yet, when we
say all is quality does that mean sq and dq must
'overlap' or be together, in order to be 'enclosed'
within quality.  How does sq and dq come together?  Sq
and dq don't push each other away.  Dq is fundamental
reality, and sq is this fundamental reality defined. 
So, with this last statement it is noticed how sq can
be dq.  I've shown the two dangers above with one of
those dangers mentioned by you.


     [David H.]
> I agree.  But we go ahead and define anyway, it is
> unavoidable.   
> Moreover, good definitions are as accurate as
> possible. That is why I  
> say sq is something, and DQ is nothing.

     I total agree with what your saying here.  Yet, I
hope you see the danger in keeping dq apart from sq. 
And yes, we do keep defining, and yet, while I
meditate I don't define.  I have experienced moments
of 'what the heck is this', but through practice my
habit doesn't latch upon these kinds of questions
while meditating.  Actually while meditating now if I
do latch onto these kinds of questions I don't feel
well, my head spins, I lose focus, and the meditation
will throw me off for the rest of the day, night, or
until I regain the understanding of quietness, again. 
 Now-a-days, these moments of lost focus, haven't been
around that much, and as long as I keep practicing, I
hope it stays this way.  I did say while meditating I
don't define, because as I discuss with you or anybody
else it is important to define 'things' correctly. 
Yet, with you and anybody else the same undefining is
still happening.  As long as I realize this, then I'm
realizing dq in sq or in other words, non-attachment. 
This also avoids the danger of placing dq somewhere
else away from static patterns.  



snowing,
SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097