[MD] Gawain
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Mon Jan 22 01:29:48 PST 2007
Robbie,
You did get that the questions were for self consideration. You seem
an example of what Gawain rose above, and where the captain got
stuck. Would any statement I make be an invitation to
lecture? Bullshit!!! But do you really know how to love a woman
(life, game, now)?
m
At 07:03 PM 1/21/2007, Robbie wrote:
>Says Marsha:
>
>"Sad that there would only be those two choices".
>
>
>
>Robbie:
>
>Right. The entire spectrum of reality covers a multiplicity of shades of
>gray and things are never just black and white. Negotiation skills are a
>must.
>
>
>
>But your fable posed the question, what do women really want?? Well, its
>looks like we are starting to smoke you out with the help of the Swami on
>whatever the page was. Looks like "the wants" will become a tall order,
>rather daunting really.
>
>
>
>Doesn't look like I got too many of the 7 basic qualities covered, and
>fortunately it is not a life or death situation as per Arthur. But I agree
>that cogent answers to all of the questions Marsha poses are required.
>Excepting while all of these "qualities" are being acted out; How do all the
>bills get paid?
>
>
>
>The witch really did err for the reason I cited before. Do existential
>choices really exist? One person's total freedom acts as a substantial
>restraint on everybody else. (This law applies at all levels: planetary,
>national, local government, job politics and family issues.) Sustainability
>and the tragedy of the commons, enters the picture. ...stage right. I mean
>imagine a world where all women are Paris Hilton. (or all men are Napoleon,
>to make this screed gender neutral) Dante's inferno becomes real.
>
>
>
>These issues are best worked out by those younger and less set in our ways.
>Because like most old geezers like me, we are too absorbed by many illusions
>and delusions to worry so much about stressing out on all these quality
>details and dynamic realities... being the static old fart that I am.
>
>
>
>Marsha further quizzes me on, "Which traditional parable do you prefer? Can
>you reference a better one from ZMM or LILA?" Sorry none comes to mind from
>ZMM/Lila.
>
>
>
>In fact parables have been kinda troublesome to me: I have always been
>troubled by the parable of the prodigal child, located somewhere in the King
>James Bible. If anyone can cite a reference book or explain to me the 3 to 5
>layered answer to that one. I would be really grateful.
>
>
>
>A Reference book with answers to traditional parables and Zen koans (heck
>toss in some Taoist and Sufi stuff too) would really be a treasure. But a
>treatise, perhaps, less entertaining than King Arthur's fable above. In
>fact, this reference book might read more like the telephone directory. Not
>a best seller or big page turner volume. Paradoxical literature that
>actually models, presents and exposes, "explains reality" would have no
>market acceptance. Perhaps, only an academic, ivory tower publisher. Unlike
>ZMM, which was rejected by many, many publishers...This treatise may never
>be published. Maybe I'll try to look for it on the Wikipedia??
>
>
>
>This concludes the rambling.
>
>Robbie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list