[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting "Laycock, Jos (OSPT)" <Jos.Laycock at OFFSOL.GSI.GOV.UK>:

> Ok noted, but isn't "(in) themselves" a word best avoided at this juncture?
 
Added for clarity. Remove if you wish.


> > -----Original Message-----
> > Subject: Re: [MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)
> > 
> > 
> > Quoting "Laycock, Jos (OSPT)" <Jos.Laycock at OFFSOL.GSI.GOV.UK>:
> > 
> > > I think the tenses are all wrong here, 
> > > It's better to say "emerges" rather than emerged.
> > > 
> > > Then, "such a system" comes now from quality interractions, still.
> > > 
> > > "does it emerge suddenly from nothing?" 
> > > yes, with every passing moment static patterns are 
> > actualised out of nothingness. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Right?
> > 
> > Just a minor addendum. The "system" I referred to is the 
> > interactions themselves,
> > not what supposedly emerges from the interactions.



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/