[MD] Mystics, Brains -- Matt has a question

Case Case at iSpots.com
Sun Jan 28 21:35:46 PST 2007


Mark said:
You have made a fundamental assumption that DQ is being  defined Matt.  It
is not and cannot be defined.

Matt:
Yeah,  well, just as you said, "it is extrapolated from your own
statements." 
My sense is that you're commiting a mistake, just as you  sense the same
when looking my direction. I tried explaining my  sense.

It was an interesting conversation while it  was,


Mark: Bye.

[Case]
Since this is over let me point out that a major source of difficulty is
this business about DQ being undefined. Mark wants to define it so bad that
he actually does but gives it a new name and claims that a name change is
not a definition.

Quality is undefined. DQ and SQ are aspects of Quality. I see no reason why
one aspect can be discussed and the other can not. 

Truly this is the sound of one hand clapping.




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list