[MD] Mystics, Brains -- Matt has a question
Case
Case at iSpots.com
Sun Jan 28 21:35:46 PST 2007
Mark said:
You have made a fundamental assumption that DQ is being defined Matt. It
is not and cannot be defined.
Matt:
Yeah, well, just as you said, "it is extrapolated from your own
statements."
My sense is that you're commiting a mistake, just as you sense the same
when looking my direction. I tried explaining my sense.
It was an interesting conversation while it was,
Mark: Bye.
[Case]
Since this is over let me point out that a major source of difficulty is
this business about DQ being undefined. Mark wants to define it so bad that
he actually does but gives it a new name and claims that a name change is
not a definition.
Quality is undefined. DQ and SQ are aspects of Quality. I see no reason why
one aspect can be discussed and the other can not.
Truly this is the sound of one hand clapping.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list