[MD] metaphysics, substance, intellect
Ron Kulp
RKulp at ebwalshinc.com
Thu Jul 12 11:45:04 PDT 2007
[Joe]
For
> myself I see value determined in an octave relationship, rather than
only
> the 4 levels of organic, inorganic, social, intellectual proposed by
> Pirsig.
[Ron]
To tie in Joe's octave theory with my previous post, sound is considered
a low frequency
energy emission and atomic electron/proton orbitals are now being viewed
as quantum vibrating
oscillations somwhat like string theory. The term which encompasses all
of them and Pirsigs levels
is the inter-relatedness and the concept of how it functions together.
To view reality as inter-related
forms of energy and not so much as what we commonly concieve of
evolution and the linear perception of time.
I would like to hear your thoughts on the six zero's and how you
divide elements by zero?
I'm still not sure I understand this idea.
Thanks
----- Original Message ----
From: Jared M <TE at transcendentethos.com>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2007 2:30:09 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] metaphysics, substance, intellect
Joe,
Your individualizam has captured my intrigue. will you expand upon your
ocataval idea regarding the ralationship of values?
Jared
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Maurer" <jhmau at sbcglobal.net>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] metaphysics, substance, intellect
> On Friday 6 July 2007 10:41:34 PM Jared M writes to Joe (and all)
>
> thanks for such a warm welcome.
> preficing your response with "IMO" indicates a certain dynamic
quality.
> therefore i submit to you the following ideas; cutting an other edge
of
> reality.
>
> 1.) the periodic table is a useful way to illustrate physical value
> relationships.
> it has great static quality.
>
> 2.) life/evolution is a process that manifests itself as a queer,
> seemingly anti-entropic phenomenon that the constituent "value
> relationships" (matter/stuff) described in the table convey.the table
> is a result of evolution; homosapiens, a result of evolution, created
> the table and therefore it shall not deny it.
>
> my interjection of Emerson's essay is meant to inspire discussion of
the
> transcendental or "dynamic quality" correlation between two brilliant
> philosophers, disparate only by time (one hundred years.)
>
> Hi Jared and all,
>
> Hey! Thanks for your input, and welcome!
>
> IMO Pirsig proposed evolution as the basis of morality in that if the
> higher level destroys the lower level it destroys itself by stopping
> evolution. If the lower level destroys the higher level it denies its
own
> existence and will cease to exist as a level.
>
> The periodic table is a numbers game where you cannot divide by 0. In
the
> language game of evolution proposed by Pirsig 0 divides the levels.
> Aristotle proposed prime matter as almost 0. The ?transcendental?
accepts
> a mind-body split which leads to a subjective objective division of
> thought. For Pirsig objective, subjective depends on value not mind.
For
> myself I see value determined in an octave relationship, rather than
only
> the 4 levels of organic, inorganic, social, intellectual proposed by
> Pirsig.
>
> Joe
>
>
> Joe,(and all)
> thanks for such a warm welcome.
> preficing your response with "IMO" indicates a certain dynamic
quality.
> therefore i submit to you the following ideas; cutting an other edge
of
> reality.
>
> 1.) the periodic table is a useful way to illustrate physical value
> relationships.
> it has great static quality.
>
> 2.) life/evolution is a process that manifests itself as a queer,
> seemingly anti-entropic phenomenon that the constituent "value
> relationships" (matter/stuff) described in the table convey.
> the table is a result of evolution; homosapiens, a result of
evolution,
> created the table and therefore it shall not deny it.
>
> my interjection of Emerson's essay is meant to inspire discussion of
the
> transcendental or "dynamic quality" correlation between two brilliant
> philosophers, disparate only by time (one hundred years.)
>
>
> -jared
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list