[MD] Limits of freedom
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Thu Jul 19 23:59:46 PDT 2007
At 06:55 PM 7/19/2007, Platt wrote:
>The criteria for nudity being biological for humans is its close
>association with
>the sexual act.
Hi Platt,
If you see nudity closely associated with the sexual act, then I
suspect you've been socialized to see it that way. During the
Victorian period, to see a woman's ankles was thought to promote
sexual associations. I was thinking more of Meet The Press, with Tim
Russet interviewing Dick Cheney. Both sitting there in their
birthday suit. Hahahahaha Hardly a sexual image, and might even
do a lot to promote reading.
I thought Saving Private Ryan was an important anti-war film, but I
don't think it appropriate for television. It's the constant
violence that sets up patterns of violence. Nudity constantly placed
within a sexual context promotes sexual patterns. I'm sure you know
what I'm suggesting, a little sense of responsibility to civic life
rather than the abandonment of principles for the profit margin.
Marsha
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list