[Moq_Discuss] [MD] Aristotle & DQ

[ian glendinning]

Run that past me again Jos,

I recognise the circularity - motive to betterness pre-supposes what
is better - and that in reality there is a "lack of independence" - no
simple causal relationships, just "dependent arisings", but unpick
your last two sentences for me ... where you said ...

[Jos]
>
> Where given "improvements" are considered to be made within the defined
subset moral codes of each observer defined set, I have of course lost
all real sense of what it means to improve something, but have
sucessfully (albeit badly) defined betterness. ... I'ts complete
doublethink, but IMO a delusion of high quality.
>

Quality can of course go up as well as down, is that what you are saying ?
As Gav says, MoQ is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Regards, Ian