[Moq_Discuss] Essentialism: MATTER AND FORM
Ham Priday
hampday1 at verizon.net
Tue Jul 24 12:01:34 PDT 2007
Ron [Marsha mentioned] --
> When I wiki "essentialism" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essentialism
> the explanation of it is akin to Plato's forms and holds that these
> forms are fixed and absolute.
> Ham, Is the Essentialism described in Wikipedia the same, close,
> or another school of thought when compared to your Ontology?
The simplest answer is that Wiki's article has used Essentialism to identify
Plato's Idealism, which does not represent my philosophy. Plato regarded
the nature of things as "essences" and attributed them to ideas, which he
regarded as "eternal". This has nothing to do with Essence as I have
theorized it, nor did Plato call his philosophy Essentialism.
The word means many things to many people. I define Essence as "the
ultimate, unconditional, necessary Source or 'whatness' of reality." There
is only one Essence; anything else is an "essent" in my philosophy, meaning
something divided by nothingness. Thus, things and creatures are essents,
and their only connection to Essence is value-sensibility -- the
differentiated perception of the absolute source by which creatures and
their awareness subsist.
Concerning Marsha's quote from Pirsig's MOQ summary, I do not consider the
MOQ a "method of investigation, a tool for a more accurate perception...in
value perception." I consider it a euphemistic perspective, albeit one
presented with poetic touches. What scientist would seriously consider the
Metaphysics of Quality an "investigative tool"? I certainly wouldn't
presume to claim this for Essentialism. And what is "more accurate" about
a morality that says, "Some things are better than others?" Let's get
"real", Mr. Pirsig!
He goes on...
"Noether's theorem, the conservation of energy is a consequence of the
fact that the laws of physics do not change over time."
If that is true, then the laws of physics cannot be proven false, which puts
physical science in the same class as the religion Mr. Pirsig demeans. I
think you'll find that quite a few laws of physics have at least been
modified, even since Einstein's time.
"Dualism dissolves in the light of this theory for all (including space and
consciousness) is
energy."
So Mind, Matter, and Reality are all energy. I guess that includes Quality
as well!
Once again, this is not a philosopher talking; it's an evolutionist who
likes to paint existence in nice-sounding cliches that make us feel good
about reality. I, for one, will not buy into the theory that reality is
fundamentally a Goodness called energy, no matter how simple it sounds.
Good luck to all,
Ham
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list