[MD] Alternatives to the scientific method

gav gav_gc at yahoo.com.au
Fri Jul 27 03:17:24 PDT 2007


forgot the observer eh?


--- "Laycock, Jos (OSPT)"
<Jos.Laycock at OFFSOL.GSI.GOV.UK> wrote:

> Ian --
> > 
> > > I was not referring to the hypothesis, but the
> four step 
> > process itself;
> > > that is presumed common sense too, but unfounded
> and untestable
> > > in itself. (A meta-problem)
> 
> Ham
> 
> What grounds do you have for this claim?  And what
> would Ian Glendinning 
> propose as a more efficacious alternative to the
> scientific method?
> 
> Me:
> 
> Ham, I think that by asking that question you miss
> your own opportunity to even try and come up with
> something, would you like to join Ian out on his
> limb and see if anything springs to mind?
> 
> To re-state it:
> 
> 1)Propose an explanatory hypothesis to describe the
> operation of a given system, 
> 2)Invent experiments that are potentially
> confounding of that hypothesis and test it to
> destruction. 
> 3)Repeat steps 1 & 2 iteratively until satisfied
> that no further potentially confounding experiments
> can be conceived of. 
> 4)Write down your conclusions and show them to some
> other scientists.
> 
> Seems reasonable enough, but the issues are:
> Why look at that particular system?
> Why test these particular hypotheses?
> What defines the operational parameters of the
> system? - and further, 
> When science by its nature makes a requirement of
> impartiality, how do you ensure that you pursue
> hypothesis formulation with equal zeal as
> experimental investigation? Its like asking a lawyer
> to be defence and prosecution at the same time.
> 
> So, enough negativity then, lets have some
> suggestions,
> Mine is as follows:
> 
> 
> "Test everything"
> Random/Chaotic hypothesis formulations are made by a
> supercomputer SC1 based on a dataset of all
> available data. These are constantly "tested" by an
> adversarial supercomputer SC2, and the results of
> SC2 are fed back to SC1 as further information on
> which to base new hypotheses. 
> Communications between computers 1 & 2 is monitored
> by 3rd independent supercomputer which maps the
> iterations and extrapolates from the developing
> patterns to predict end points. These are also fed
> back to SC1, and the communications between SC3 and
> SC1 are monitored and mapped by you guessed it SC4
> etc.....
> 
> The logical operations of SC2, 3 and 4 etc... need
> to be defined and I suggest using a further
> independent supercomputer to use genetic algorithms
> to define the logic of the other computers
> pragmatically from the results of their own early
> experiments, constantly refreshing them with "new
> best logics" as it refines them.
> 
> So the whole thing would create layers of patterns
> of information, and define sets of pragmatic rules
> to operate at each level, generating no answers at
> all, but instead setting out the available data in
> one large ordered pattern allowing an observer
> to......
> 
> oh.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
> for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
> unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is
> not permitted. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
> sender by return e-mail.
> 
> This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only
> for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
> unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is
> not permitted. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the
> sender by return e-mail.
> 
> This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the
> recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained
> by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring /
> blocking software may be used, and e-mail content
> may be read at any time. You have a responsibility
> to ensure laws are not broken when composing or
> forwarding e-mails and their contents.
> 
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses
> by the Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus service
> supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with
> MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007.)
> On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus
> free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically
> logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
> purposes.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on all webmail accounts. 
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list