[MD] Alternatives to the scientific method

Ron Kulp RKulp at ebwalshinc.com
Mon Jul 30 06:00:01 PDT 2007


 

Ron,

You misinterpret me, again. Probably my fault. But I do not believe I
construct reality, although my actions in the present can affect the
"future". Reality does not exist without man and man does not exist
without reality. Neither is primary and both are objective in nature.

I'm not sure how you read my statement and made the jump to yours, I
don't see the connection.



Micah,
How I interpret "reality does not exist without man", is the argument I
have and I believe others have
posted, that if reality can not be proven to exist independent of
humans, then how can one be
sure if what is percieved objectivly as fellow humans (which is part of
objective reality)
can be proven to exist?  since this is your contention we ask you how
can you be certain,
using this logic, that you are not the only human? for we are all
objective reality to you.
and by your view only exist in the prescence of you. 

If I am misinterpreting please excuse me
and afford me the opportunity to get it correct.
Thanks 
-Ron







More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list