[MD] Alternatives to the scientific method

Laycock, Jos (OSPT) Jos.Laycock at OFFSOL.GSI.GOV.UK
Tue Jul 31 06:40:22 PDT 2007


Response 1 has arrived! 
These scientists are so dogmatic!

Quote: 
Does "the method" as inferred from Popper et al specifically require objectivism? 

One is hard pressed to judge ones own objectivism. Scientific skepticism about what we think we understand objectively is prudent. Sooner or later this tends to happen but it can take hundreds or thousands of years and possibly much longer in some cases. 

Quote: 
In its most reduced theoretical terms how would you define "the method"?  

People have spent considerable portions of their lives pondering and writing about "the method", to attempt to reduce it is to throw away insight. 

Quote: 
Do "you" consider that you hold a particular metaphysical position? 

I'm not going there. 
Quote: 
How do you categorise "scientists", and who would you specifically exclude from that group?? 

I'm not going there either.



This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list