[MD] Alternatives to the scientific method
pholden at davtv.com
pholden at davtv.com
Tue Jul 31 08:12:36 PDT 2007
Quoting "Laycock, Jos (OSPT)" <Jos.Laycock at OFFSOL.GSI.GOV.UK>:
> Ok so Kepler says we must measure things, but I can measure anything I like!
Not if your goal is to follow the scientific method of replicating an experiment.
You must measure what the original experimenter measured.
> I may be open then to criticisms of the quality of my measurements, but thats a
> different story. My answers will keep changing, but thats no different from trying
> to measure the position of a particle, each time you ask the question the
> situation is changed, so you cant perform the same experiment twice.
As I understand it, measuring quantum particles is done mathematically using
certain formulas. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_in_quantum_mechanics
> Repeatability
> is context dependent, and varies in its impact on the quality of the data.
Is not repeatability essential to the scientific method?
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list