[MD] Alternatives to the Scientific Method

[ian glendinning]

Ham,
I will certainly take a look at those papers too Ham, right up my
street in terms of interest.

I find myself drawn back to having another look at your essentialism
too. I've admitted we're close on many things before, but I forget why
I ultimately decided you'a taken a step too far with your pet theory.

(Busy couple of days and travelling next week, so not sure when I'll
come back on this.)

Ian

On 7/30/07, Ham Priday <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Marsha --
>
> > Both very interesting papers.  It makes me think I should read all
> > the articles on your values page.  - Marsha
>
> Indeed, that is my fervent hope ;-)
>
> Incidentally, I don't see anything in these essays that would conflict with
> the MoQ.  Do you?
>
> Glad you found them interesting, and thanks for letting me know.
>
> Best regards,
> Ham
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>