[MD] Alternatives to the scientific method

[Heather Perella]

     [Jos]
> I also think its clear, and so does Platt, and all
> three have subtly different interpretations.
> What do you make of the comment from random
> scientist number 1 then?
> Seemed a lot like "we all know what it is but cant
> define it" to me, which is a lot like saying "we
> dont really want to look to carefully in case we all
> didn't mean the same thing after all".


     I see it as being-unaware or denial.  A knowing
that something is happening that is not totally
scientific, the traditional willingness of what
science does.  For instance, the 1 random scientist
didn't want to define who a scientist was and didn't
want to define 'the method'.  So, there are no
scientists and no method to science (sounds
mad/crazy)?
     Where is 1 random scientist providing his/her
answers to you from again?  Is it that website?  Are
they truly scientists?

thanks.
trees,
SA


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433