[MD] Perception,evolution and the spirit

[Akshay Peshwe]

SA/Heather,

Maybe DQ can be defined as whatever that's happening now, at this very
moment, everything you're conscious of. And then SQ is the past, the
remnants of then-DQ, and also the predicted future (because of our
intellectual abilities). In a way, I see DQ as computation, SQ as
information. Compsci is the Answer. :)

-- Akshay


On 6/1/07, Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>     [Akshay]
> > And so in a way I still agree with the MoQ's
> division :p. But why is
> > Dynamic Quality attributed to growth? It shouldn't
> be. I thought DQ > is associated with the direct
> experience I'm having at the moment
> > as I type this, the real moment.
>
>
>
>     Yes.  This also goes along with what I partly
> mentioned in the [MD] Soft Duality post.  Dynamic
> Quality is direct experience and primary reality,
> thus, dq is empirical.  Now try to define this direct
> experience.  Static quality is more difficult maybe,
> or maybe instead of difficult, how about - open.  The
> levels can't be rigidly made distinct, yet.  And this
> 'yet' is an unending, thus, open 'yet'.  And I've just
> went around in a circle for dq is a question, an open
> unending question, as in 'What is Quality?'.  Answers
> will be static, but the question remains dynamic.
>
> circles,
> SA
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> TV dinner still cooling?
> Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>