[MD] Pirsig and TITs

[Heather Perella]

     [dmb]
> A transcendent world? I think Krimel was right to
> conjure up Kant's 
> things-in-themselves.
> 
> [Krimel]
> I should not be repeating myself like this, but this
> is a  slightly edited
> version of what I just posted to DM in the
> cyberspace thread. I think it
> applies:
> I whole heartedly agree that all we have is our
> individual experience, our
> individual realities. But I am equally willing to
> say, purely as a matter of
> faith, that I believe we have experience "OF"
> something. That our realities
> are constructed as representations "OF" something.
> Call it TiTs. Call it objectivity. Call it Other. 


     Isn't this also saying that when I see a tree,
another human being, or a bird, etc... they could
easily see me as another human being, and notice a
tree or a bird, etc...

SA



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091