[MD] Is morality Hard Wired?

[David M]

Krim

Hence my point that evolutionary theory is largely
Darwinian and is limited in its application elsewhere.
Did that get lost somewhere?

DM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Krimel" <Krimel at Krimel.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Is morality Hard Wired?


> DM,
> Aren't they all?
> Krimel
> ---------------------
> 
> Hi Krim
> 
> Yes, but the latching mechanism,where there is one,
> may be very different.
> 
> DM
> 
>> DM,
>>
>> Static patterns act as resistance to the dynamic flow of energy. In a 
>> river
>> it's the rocks. In mating it's incest taboos. In economics it's cost to
>> benefit ratios.
>>
>> Krimel
>> -------------------------
>> Krim
>>
>> The analogy works some of the way but is limited,
>> as the valuing, selection & breeding criteria are different.
>>
>> DM
>>
>> -------------------------
>>> [DM]
>>> Do we not need to understand how patterns emerge, why they persist, why
>>> they
>>> change, how levels emerge,etc?
>>>
>>> [Krimel]
>>> I suspect it has much to do with the consistency of the flow of energy
>>> into the system along the lines of Prigogine.
>>>
>>> [DM]
>>> (NB Darwin's suggestions are a useful subset of what happens
>>> across all the levels, but I object to Darwin's ideas being used
>>> beyond self-replicating reproductive-selective processes, although
>>> a good analogy is a good analogy )
>>>
>>> [Krimel]
>>> You don't think societies and ideas are "self-replicating
>>> reproductive-selective processes?"
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>