[MD] Progress in art?

[ian glendinning]

Rats ! well spotted Craig.
Dare I say the number isn't important to the point - no, thought not.

Oh well - I'm sure the 800G's covered more than the logo - it paid for
the Olins name too I guess ... anyway you left off my parenthesis
(from that perspective) ie a (not necessarily very good) business
deal, nothing to do with the header of the thread.

Plenty of people have grandly over-paid for an Ohlins corporate image
deal before - nice work if you can get it. I guess this very expensive
example proves the value in getting it right.

Ian

On 6/11/07, craigerb at comcast.net <craigerb at comcast.net> wrote:
> [ian]
> > 80 grand well spent [for the London 2012 Olympic logo].
>
> Unfortunately, the cost was $800,000.
> Craig
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>