[MD] a/theism one/zero

[MarshaV]

How about zone and ero?


At 04:55 AM 6/13/2007, Jos wrote:


>My personal objection to the use of atheism as a term to describe my 
>outlook is the same as my line of reasoning in the 1 zero thread.
>Where a given value of "one" is dynamically attached to a related 
>value of "zero" the word atheism defines theism as "one" and atheism 
>is "zero", which asserts that the value of my "zero" is set by the 
>value of that "one".
>
>It isnt.