[MD] the essential stupidity of atheists (and theists)

[ian glendinning]

The problem is Omar, very little "can be proved either way" so
sometimes you just have to make a choice about what you believe,
albeit a contingent one; on where you stand, if asked.

But like I said, and you illustrate, the debate boils down to your
preferred metaphor for the god in question. I'd also rather not argue
the original question either, or simply answer "mu", but if asked,
tick one and ony one box ...

theist
atheist
anti-theist
agnostic

I'm atheist, but ...
I wish Sam was here.

Ian

On 6/13/07, Omar Kamel <righter at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just think it's a waste of time going on about something that can't be
> proved either way unless you accept a pantheistic position in which case
> belief is no longer required since the sum total of your experiential data
> is itself demonstratively 'god'.
>
> And that's pretty much all I have to say on religion...
>
> Omar
>