[MD] mythological reflections on star wars

[MarshaV]

SA,

God?  Nada, I don't want to have this discussion.  I will repeat Tom 
Robbin's words: "I believe in nothing, everything is sacred. I 
believe in everything, nothing is sacred."  These words are a sea of 
tranquility, and tonight still with only a slight hint of reflection.


Marsha



At 12:11 PM 6/17/2007, you wrote:
> > > >      [Marsha previously to gav]
> > > > > Would you like to write about something that
> > > isn't a concept?
> > > > > God.  Pebble.  No difference.
>
>
> >      [SA previously]
> > > >      What are you asking here?
>
>      Alright, I'm going to try to interpret what you
>might have been saying here Marsha.  I kept asking you
>questions so as not to put words in your mouth, to
>give you your freedom.  Unless you like to labyrinth
>on purpose, but this answer you gave to gav above is
>seemingly specific.  So, I'll say something and maybe
>it's what you meant or maybe it doesn't matter to you
>what you meant to others or not.
>      Your saying God and Pebble are concepts.  There
>is no difference.
>      If so, then I disagree due to this is correct but
>something is still missing in my perspective.  God is
>not only a concept, but God is to not just be on the
>intellectual level.  Many different Gods exist if we
>go by social level religions.  God has been reasoned
>differently, therefore on the intellectual level God
>has many manifestations, too.  According to dynamic
>quality, God is rid of, is a changing force, a
>creative force, is direct experience, primary reality,
>and can't be explained using S/O intellectual musings.
>  I'd say Pebble is the same, and pebbles have been and
>are sacred in certain cultures.  Pebbles are reasoned
>specifically, more so than God has been due to
>science.  According to dynamic quality, pebble still
>has space to change (back into the mantle, volcano -
>lava).  Our use for pebbles socially or even
>intellectually in an artistic and mystical depth
>supplies pebble with all kinds of fun.  With Zen
>no-mind, I can stare at a pebble and just bask in the
>depth and wonderment of what this pebble is without
>intellectual explanations.
>      So, no difference: dynamic quality.
>      Difference:  static quality when the levels made
>distinct.
>     pebble and God when distinct are in a general way
>both static patterns of value and here also:  no
>difference.
>
>      So, you see, this statement by you opens all
>kinds of curiosity, which I'm inclined to say is good.
>  Your statement above is a mythology, an analogue, a
>static pattern sprouting dynamic quality.
>
>      As to the standards set, your seemingly small
>statement here has set a standard that is definitely a
>depth of no end and no beginning that is dynamic.
>Sooooo, who's really setting the standards here?  You
>see when I ask you questions, I'm seriously wondering
>if your intention is to create a mythology, in the
>dynamic sense, thus, to encourage a flow of artistic,
>free thinking, non-dead static quality.
>
>woods,
>SA
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Choose the right car based on your needs.  Check out Yahoo! Autos 
>new Car Finder tool.
>http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/