[MD] Rorty News

[Matt Kundert]

Platt, you forgot our deal.  I would stop imputing to you an absurd notion 
of "absolute truth" if you stopped imputing to Rorty the notion that he 
thinks that truth can be replaced by utility.  Rorty spent a career 
rescinding such a view (it's questionable whether he ever really forwarded 
it, even at his early Peircian moments).

Rorty knows, knew, as well as anyone else that truth cannot be defined as 
usefulness.  He doesn't, didn't, think truth can be defined at all.  Much 
like other things we here are familiar with.

Matt

p.s. I don't know who Caldwell is, but he's just repeating the same thing 
the classical pragmatists were hearing during their time.  My bet is 
somebody like Russell or (or maybe Lovejoy) advanced that argument all those 
years ago.


>The best critique I know of Rorty's philosophy was said by Roger Caldwell:
>
>"If, as Rorty proposes, we replace the notion of truth with that of 
>usefulness, so
>that we accept only those propositions which we find in general to the 
>'useful,'
>then the question arises as to whether they are really useful or not. That 
>is, the
>very criteria by which we judge a proposition to be useful involve the same
>recourse to a correspondence with reality which the theory denies in 
>advance.
>We are left, inescapably, with the conclusion that the theory is 
>incoherent."

_________________________________________________________________
Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now. 
It’s free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_June07