[MD] mythological reflections on star wars

[MarshaV]

At 04:32 PM 6/18/2007, you wrote:
>      [SA previously]
> > >      And this is why literalism is a barrier to
> > >understanding a reality that includes that which is
>ineffable.
>
>      [Marsha]
> > Would you say that ambiguousness is an advantage to
>understanding > a reality that includes that which is
>ineffable?
>
>
>      Ambiguous doesn't understand anything, thus,
>static quality.  Static quality is stable enough to
>get an understanding across, with the levels and such,
>but these levels are not totally distinct due to there
>growth, non-deadness, and therefore openness to dq.
>Therefore when you say, "Exactly!" but then say your
>only kidding about literalism being a barrier it
>doesn't make sense.  My previous quote above is
>plain-spoken.  Literalism in SOM is too rigid and
>distinct.  It is too black and white.  To be literal
>in SOM is different than being literal in MOQ.
>Literal in MoQ is plain-spoken using static patterns
>of value, but it is understood that the big picture
>includes dynamic quality.
>
>This is how I see this.
>
>thunderstorm!!!!!!! yeah!
>


Strange, SA.  I thought your 'later in the evening now' was chocked 
full of meaning, an ambiguous-type of meaningful.

Marsha