[MD] What is knowledge?

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting ian glendinning <psybertron at gmail.com>:

> Ah yes Platt, the old ones are the best ... the axiom that there are no axioms.
> 
> We cannot be "certain" Platt, in any sense that would satisfy a person
> who refuses to see the value in recursion, we can only be wise and
> enlightened, as I actually said.
> 
> Ian

You seem to be certain that "we can only be wise and enlightened." I presume
you do not see the self-contradiction because you do not accept the value
of logic. Further, I presume it's fruitless to define "wise" and "enlightened."
Thus, I conclude your statement is meaningless.




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/