[MD] Quantum computing

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting Arlo Bensinger <ajb102 at psu.edu>:

> [Arlo]
> Below when I say "as a metaphysics, its descriptions can contain 
> experience without paradox.", I meant to say "as a metaphysics, its 
> descriptions can NOT contain experience without paradox."
> 
> Sorry for the confusion.

Right. I skipped right over it. Metaphysics is, was and always will be
intellectual. The heart of SOM is its metaphysics. The heart of the MOQ
is other than itself.  

> >What the MOQ does is make evident the "event horizon" surrounding
> >Quality. When Pirsig says "all this is just an analogy", he includes
> >within it the MOQ itself. Sure, the MOQ gives us a better way to
> >intellectually carve-up our experiences, and does not divide us from
> >the world as does SOM, but as an intellectual system, as a
> >metaphysics, its descriptions can contain experience without paradox.
> >Indeed, the key difference is that while SOM is blind to this, and
> >actively seeks an intellectual "literal truth", the MOQ embraces it,
> >and says that that core experience can only be seen through analogy,
> >metaphor, art, can only be glimpsed pre-intellectually.
> >
> >moq_discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/