[MD] -elitist ideas

[MarshaV]

At 11:20 AM 3/10/2007, you wrote:
>Thanks again Arlo.
>
> > I think I'd say "betterness", or Quality, is pursued on all MOQ levels.
> > Sometimes these levels conflict in value.
>
>Yes.  But there is clearly much disagreement, at least at moq.org, about
>these inter-level conflicts and their meaning.
>
>I wonder whether what attracts people to the MOQ is its explanation
>why things interact they way they do - always driven by a move toward
>betterness - and its silence on the meaning of the interactions, i.e., they
>can mean everything and they can mean nothing.  It seems to me their
>meaning is dependent on the observer's perspective on the observed and
>in how they allow themselves to be affected by their observations and
>interactions.
>

Hi Arlo & Kevin,

Hmmm.  I think Quality (a 'better' word) is amoral.  And rather than 
a drive towards "betterness", a drive towards Quality is a drive 
towards the amoral, dynamic Quality.  Do you disagree with this statement?

m