[MD] -elitist ideas

[MarshaV]

At 11:27 AM 3/11/2007, Arlo wrote:
>[Marsha]
>I stated that Quality/DQ was amoral.  I did not state that SPoVs were amoral.
>
>[Arlo]
>How does morality derive from amorality? Let's back away from static
>social-level morals, and let's say "gravitation". If gravity is "inorganic
>moral value" (as Pirsig states), how does it derive from an amoral Quality?

Arlo,

Up until now our discussion has been focused totally on Quality/DQ, 
not static quality.  Why the switch?

While I think Dynamic Quality is undefinable (Pirsig says so.).  I 
think the static quality, static patterns of value, on all four 
levels are nothing but morality.

If you're asking me how a static pattern of value comes into 
existence.  My answer is through an experience event.   No 
experience, no value.   No value, no morality.

Besides what is amorality?  Amoral means without moral 
quality.   Amoral cannot be defined.  It's like no-thing.

Marsha