[MD] FW: Quantum weirdness

[Ron Kulp]

[Ham]
What is the logic of the statement "oneness rests in a dichotomy", and
how do you draw this conclusion from Case's statement?  A process is
neither a dichotomy nor a duality, so the term isn't even relevant here.
What may be relevant is deriving "differentiation" from oneness, and
perhaps that is the duality you are referring to. But that is not a
"dichotomy" because it is not two contingencies of a single system
You're describing existence -- a differentiated system, not the source
which is not a differentiated system.
Oneness transcends multiplicity but cannot logically be defined by it.




Ham,
It is my theory that the universe will not just burn out. the same way
with terming "source"..
Source eludes to origin,
The inuendo of beginning and end. It doesent seem correct given what we
know. I logically came to the conclusion
That beginning and end can not exist separate of each other and
therefore must be one. Perpetually.each
Causing the other, or it could never achieve existence. If oneness of
all reality was absolute it would
Be either absolutly energy or absoluty dead mass which condenses on
itself. At this point it is niether.
Therefore no absolutes can exist of either or that's what it would it
be,... now. which it is not. 
So I term It a "process" in context with "system". And that's the long
and the short of it.
Reality is its own cause perpetually at every moment, beginning and end
are now.
I know I'm beginning to Sound "loopy" (parden the pun) but that's as
close as I can describe it.

I also think scientists are not Taking into account spacial
gravitational effect at atomic level. 
The fact that atoms move constantly Through a Quantum string-loop
spacial field, warping it with 
its mass. when obseved at a subatomic level,this Would acount for the
weird things going on 
"down there".

-Ron