[MD] experience

[Kevin Perez]

Hello Arlo.
 
> [...] the MOQ broadens our understanding of the world away from the
> Subject/Object divide into an integrated way of understanding, one that begins
> with value/experience (Quality) and demonstrates how this fundamental event
> (the "Quality event" as he calls it in ZMM) is as responsible for tiny inorganic
> patterns responding to gravity, as it is for an amoeba to move away from acid,
> as it is for society to pass a law against murder, as it is for Quantum Physics
> to have displaced Newtonian Physics.
 
Are you saying the MOQ demonstrates how inanimate objects experience
reality?  Please elaborate.
 
> You ask if we should add a "new definition", is that not what the MOQ is all
> about?
 
What I saw in those eight definitions was language that spoke to human
experience.  I saw nothing that would lead a person to understand that
experience was anything other than personal.
 
I hear you saying inanimate objects don't have personal experiences.  But I'm
still not clear on what you mean when you say things like,
 
     "I attribute value/experience from Quantum Physics to the tiny quanta
     themselves."
 
and
 
     "Reality/experience does not begin with "life", it begins when tiny
     inorganic patterns arrange themselves along the same principle ("it's
     better here") as do latter arriving amoebas, platypi, humans, cities and
     Physics."
 
What would an impersonal definition of experience look like?
 
Thanks.
 

Kevin
 

 
---------------------------------
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.