[MD] Quantum computing

[skutvik at online.no]

Case and all Bordercases.

On 16 Mar. you wrote:

> A few days ago, just before Horse's most recent post, a solution to my
> ongoing dilemma regarding the "level" jumped up and smacked me in the
> face. It was so simple I could not believe it had not occurred to me
> before or that I had not seen anyone else suggest it.
 
What's "your ongoing dilemma regarding the "level"? Problems 
only occurs when one looks on the MOQ from its own static 
intellectual level which - according to Magnus (and most people) 
"reflects all levels including itself". The 4th level is the SOM  and 
thus the level system becomes distorted into its notorious S/O 
shape; Intellect becomes a knowing mind and the lower levels 
become the scientific "branches of knowledge" and this creates 
dilemmas and platypis galore.  

But we are supposed to see things from the MOQ which has 
intellect as a mere static level, the highest and best, but as blind 
to the overall Quality context as the rest - the blindest in fact. 
"Language and ideas"?? When was THAT declared intellect's 
characteristics? Didn't people of old have ideas about their world 
and expressed them by language? Why must this nonsense be 
repeated again and again and always by people who has the 
least interest in the MOQ?  

IMO

Bo     







> We are not really talking about "levels" at all. We are talking about
> "branches." "Level" is simply the wrong metaphor. It implies
> discreteness and independence where they clearly do not exist.
> "Branches" implies separation and continuation at the same time. It
> allows for self similarity across scale. Branches imply mutual
> interdependency and complex interaction. They are discrete and
> continuous at the same time.
 
> Physics is a "branch" of human knowledge as are biology, sociology and
> linguists. They are branches of the college curriculum. Biology grows
> out of and branches off from physics, societies grow out of and branch
> off from biology, language and ideas grow out of and branch off from
> society. 
 
> And none of the branches is completely static they all grow, change
> and sprout. They can be treated separately in many respects. One
> branch is in many respects different from what comes before and after
> it. One might even stretch this branching of patterns into the idea of
> holons where each thing is composed of smaller things and collects
> with like things to make bigger things. 





> 
> Ah, the flights of fantasy enthusiasm launches. But does enthusiasm
> produce comment? We shall see.
> 
> Case
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
>