[MD] -elitist ideas
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Mon Mar 19 05:08:24 PDT 2007
[Case]
Still it seem to me the reason you are giving for rewriting the
dictionary definitions flows from your conclusion that the MoQ needs
the support of the revised definitions rather than because the words
actually lend themselves to the new meanings.
[Arlo]
Pardon me if I'm not overly worried about "dictionary definitions".
Just because the status quo approach to "value" over the years has
been to make it a human subjective experience gives me no desire to
keep using the word in that way when given a metaphysics that posits
"value" (Quality) as the fundamental source, prior to subjects and
objects. Besides, we're not talking "Latin" here, our language should
be flexible and adaptive, not rigid and restrictive.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list