[MD] What's missing

[Magnus Berg]

Hi Bo

 > The
> intellectual aspect of Jesus teachings only came to the fore after 
> the Reformation and Enlightenment so Christendom before this 
> watershed were just as social-tied and backward. In your 
> definition of the intellectual level this does not make sense, but 
> the MOQ view leaves you and the SOM in the dust.  

I guess this will surprise you, but it *does* make sense. I understand, and I 
also agree with, much of your view about the intellectual level and how it 
sprung out of the human social level.

What I don't agree with is your claim that the *only* paradigm that fits in the 
4th level is the S/O paradigm. I refuse to believe that the MoQ is the first 
world view that doesn't use the S/O division as the primary one, and isn't that 
what you're claiming?

I also don't agree that this is the *only* manifestation of the intellectual 
level atop social patterns. If you broaden the definition of the social level, 
it's possible to see other manifestations of intellectual levels. For some 
reason, you claim that this leads to SOM's mind, but I fail to see the 
connection. SOM's mind is the S part of the S/O division. But the "mind" you get 
with intellectual patterns in a brain is still based on the MoQ divisions (first 
DQ/SQ, and then SQ -> 4-levels). Perhaps you could elaborate on that one?

	Magnus