[MD] What's missing
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Thu Mar 22 02:58:29 PDT 2007
Platt and all fanatic MOQists ;-)
On 20 Mar 2007 you quoted Magnus'
> > Fanatic
> > Christians are just as "relieved" from intellectual values as
> > fanatic Moslems. So don't use the MoQ to demote or promote religious
> > beliefs, that's *not* what the MoQ is about.
and commented:
> Except fanatic Christians today aren't going into crowded marketplaces
> and blowing themselves up while killing hundreds of innocent
> bystanders.
Agree.
I have answered Magnus, but a bit more on this subject. As I
have understood history Islam had its heyday around year 1000
in our calendar, and while Europe was at its low ebb Islam was
the "cutting edge" culture and may be seen as having had the
same role as Antique Greece regarding sciences, if not exactly
regarding democracy. Anyway there were a most secular
leadership of Sultans, Kalifs and other potentates who did not
exactly followed the most strict regime regarding prayer and
fasting, and at that time there arose a sect in Persia called the
Assasssins that can be compared to Al Qaida with a mission to
cleanse Islam of its decadent elite. They started a terror
campaign against the establishment by sending assassins to the
various courts to kill the head figures. This was before firearms
and explosives so they had to get near enough for a dagger stab
and spent years to obtain confidence for such an event. The
attacks were just as suicidal as the present day bomb martyrs,
but the followers were absolutely devoted and ready to jump off
cliffs if their leader wanted to impress a visitor. This group
terrorized the Islamic world for about 70 years, before they were
hunted down. The conclusion is that it looks like each time Islam
is about to turn "normal" - as it was with Egypt after Nasser and
Sadat's peace settlement with Israel - some built-in mechanism
prevents it and there arises some assassin-like movement that
starts to cleanse Islam internally. The present day Al Qaida
emerging from the "Muslim Brotherhood" wasn't originally so
much concerned with the West as with their own Egyptian regime
that didn't meet their standards. There may be moderate
muslims, but they are helpless against the purists because - as
said - there exists no reformation or humanist movement in that
culture. Taleban-like regimes and Sharia Law are - and will
remain - the muslim ideal. And while the rest of the world evolves
economically the said region is notoriously stagnant.
End of history lesson.
Bo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list