[MD] What "moral revolution" is called for by the MOQ?

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:46:44 -0400  moq_discuss at moqtalk.org wrote:

> 
> [Platt]
> The main reason for the ban was the publicity surrounding the book by Rachel
> Carson, pumped to a fare-the-well by Greenpeace and other liberal
environmental
> wackos using typical scare tactics that the press loves so much to ballyhoo.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Again, with poison I don't fault anyone for erring on the side of caution. It
> seems now the restrictions will ease, so the "I Eat DDT For Breakfast" crowd
> oughta be happy.
> 
> [Platt]  
> I want motorcycles to obey the same laws as automobiles...
> 
> [Arlo]
> Then, if you were truly "less government", you should want automobile
> restrictions loosened to those of motorcycles, not the other way around.
> 
> [Platt]
> ... and I don't want people forced to wear masks.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Nor do I. But then again I don't support laws to legally FORBID the voluntary
> practice either.
> 
> [Platt]
> I also favor laws against public nudity although you are all in favor of
walking
> down the street buck naked, or so you say (speaking of hypocrites).
> 
> [Arlo]
> I favor the individual's right to choose. Saying this does not make me a
> hypocrite if I don't always choose the same way. However, saying you favor the
> individual's right to choose, and then supporting laws that take away this
> right... well, that, my friend, is hypocrisy. 
> 
> But we've kinda veered off the topic here. "Moral Revolution", what say we get
> back to that... and feed our inner hippies. :-)
> 
> 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> 
>