[MD] FW: Quantum weirdness

[Case]

> > > > > [Kevin]
> > > > > So what's the bottom line?
> > > > >  
> > > > > [Case]
> > > > > Shit Happened.
> > > > 
> > > > [Platt]
> > > > In other words, "oops."
> > > > 
> > > > > [Case]
> > > > > And really what else do you need to know about it?
> > > > 
> > > > [Platt]
> > > > Nothing that science can explain, that's for sure.
> > > > 
> > > > [Case]
> > > > So how do you explain it?
> > > 
> > > [Platt]
> > > The Principle of Quality
> > > 
> > > [Case]
> > > And this corrects the deficiencies you perceive in Big Bang cosmology
> how?
> > 
> > [Platt]
> > This furnishes a cause in lieu of "oops."
> > 
> > [Case]
> > What in the heck are you talking about? What is the Principle of
Quality?
>  
> [Platt]
> I assume you read Lila and are aware of the creative force of Quality.
> 
> [Case]
> Nowhere in Lila does Pirsig claim he is writing a work on cosmology. Nor
> does he claim to be upending the law of physics. 

[Platt]
You assumption is that the laws of physics and cosmology are the only
credible explanations of the world and its creation. Time to break out of
your box with a careful reading of Lila.    

[Case]
Once again, since my reading is manifestly so sloppy, where does Pirsig
claim to be writing a work on cosmology and to be upending the laws of
physics. It seems a fair question.