[MD] FW: Quantum weirdness
Case
Case at iSpots.com
Sat Mar 24 11:24:12 PDT 2007
> [Platt]
> You assumption is that the laws of physics and cosmology are the only
> credible explanations of the world and its creation. Time to break out of
> your box with a careful reading of Lila.
>
> [Case]
> Once again, since my reading is manifestly so sloppy, where does Pirsig
> claim to be writing a work on cosmology and to be upending the laws of
> physics. It seems a fair question.
[Platt]
You're reading can't be that sloppy. Of course Pirsig makes no overt claim
as you suggest. But he does claim there is more to the world that is dreamt
of in the laws of physics and cosmology. He calls it "Quality."
[Case]
Then why do you raise it in opposition to prevailing theories of physics and
cosmology? In what way does Pirsig's view even call these theories into
question?
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list