[MD] FW: Quantum weirdness

[Ron Kulp]

 Kevin,
The bottom line is, there is no bottom line. Case has accurately cited
the observable evidence
of Humanities best minds for the past 100 years supporting the big bang
theory. (nothing to sneeze at)
Due to my observations (something to sneeze at)
I make the point that perhaps what they are observing is'nt absolute,
that perhaps while the universe
Expands in one area it also may be contracting in another and that
perhaps that the "rounding error"
Phenomenon gives us a clue as to a more accurate theory of the totality
of this universe since mathmatics
Is an almost 1 to 1 analogie of objective reality. I think after this
conversation, that it has more to
Say about how subject percieves object. Subject may only percieve object
when a limit to sensory input
Is applied otherwise objective reality could not be interpreted
usefully. The paradox is that subject
Seems to be: object aware of itself. Which works in MOQ.

The thing I can't shake about subjective primary reality is the rational
conclusion of it, that human
Beings/me are/is an "entity" or soul or whatever, is  real and objective
reality is an illusionary
Construct of said subjective "entity". that humans/me exist and create
objective reality. Leaving
Me to ask  Did I/we allways exist? Are we just a ball of entities
floating in (space?)
Creating matter out of energy? that we, in fact are the center of the
universe and really it's just us
And nothing more. Just me and nothing more for how can I be sure of any
other awareness other than my own?
So from this perpective I see that I am the creator of my universe and
ultimately myself. Childhood
An illusion, parents an illusion, learning an illusion. I am and I have
allways been, with out beginning
Or end. I killed the Dinosaurs. I admit it, and I'd do it again..and on
the seventh day I said fuk it that's all I'm doing. Then I got lonely
and developed multiple personalities, so you see, God is insane and
Experience is nothing more than masturbation.

Now THAT is weirdness.

 I think the experience of objective reality is limited by subjective
Awareness. Thus within that context you may make the observation that
Objective awareness is subjective. It is a useful way to see 
Outside objective materialism and the obsession with it but to 
Call it scientific "fact" and claim it primary is just weird and
irrational.
And that's about the last blow I'm going to level on that dead horse
(which I've beaten down to it's componant molecules)


-Ron


-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Perez
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 4:33 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] FW: Quantum weirdness

Hello Case and Ron.
 
So what's the bottom line?
 
Thanks.
 

Kevin

 
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/