[MD] FW: Quantum weirdness

[Laycock, Jos (OSPT)]

Hi Ron

No real idea, but a few thoughts:
A while ago I started to waver on the whole MOQ business and couldn't get the idea out of my head that you could just replace "qualities" with "any one of a range of subjectively desirable attributes". I suspected that this quality was just an umbrella term, and had no meaning as a comodity in it-self.  I rejected(/ignored) this approach (although without any great conviction) and "energy" can be viewed in a similar way.

Sound, Heat, Light, Electricity, Movement, Magnetism, Potential etc etc, there are an endless range of expressions of energy, but they are all contained within this one umbrella term. Question is, does the term have any meaning as a comodity in its own right or is it just a convenient grouping label for a set of diverse phenomena?

My approach is to go back to energy/entropy equations, and reverse engineer in sematic terms. 
If you lump everything except DeltaG (free energy change) on the RHS(and assume its value to be -ve) the LHS (fleshed out a bit) says:
"any one of a range of emited phenomena observable following a reaction that is spontaneous under a given set of conditions" 

3 choices seem available in the MOQ framework:
Either energy is directly approximate to DQ 
Each form of energy is a distinct static pattern.
A mucky mixture

I like 3 best, and I reakon it comes back to quantum effects, where DQ is unobserved energy (wave form), and observable SQEnergies are the simplest forms of inorganic static patterns. DQ is there all along but when you look, the experience creates "sound", "light" etc. Neatly answers silly debates about trees falling in lonely forrests too.

What are your thoughts?

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org]On Behalf Of Ron Kulp
> Sent: 27 March 2007 15:31
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] FW: Quantum weirdness
> 
> 
> Jos,
> This has all got me to enquire about energy, what is energy? Period.
> It's like asking
> In scientific terms what is quality. Does quality = energy?  Can it be
> described in
> Terms of static and dynamic? Quite possibly. Does the 
> interaction itself
> between differing 
> forms of energy become an energy force of it's own? And can only be
> percieved by that 
> Interaction?  Any ideas?
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 



This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Department For Constitutional Affairs. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet (GSi)  virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality mark initiative for information security products and services.  For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk