[MD] On Death and Dying
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu May 3 12:17:52 PDT 2007
Joe,
My deepest condolences. My mother also has a serious medical
condition with which I've been occupied.
Pirsig's words on Chris' death in the afterward to ZMM is one of the
more meaningful short considerations of "death" I have come across.
Worth repeating. The "pattterns" Pirisig talks about, I believe, are
the dialogic inter-social, and intellectual, patterns we build over
our biological lives. They are larger than "us", and are not limited
nor confined to the biological patterns from which they emerge. Your
wife lives not only in the voices and echoes and dreams of those who
knew her, but in the myriad of ways her participation with them
effected their being, their patterns, their activity. In this sense,
I believe, we are all at once both echoes and sound.
"I tend to become taken with philosophic questions, going over them
and over them and over them again in loops that go round and round
and round until they either produce an answer or become so
repetitively locked on they become psychiatrically dangerous, and now
the question became obsessive: "Where did he go?"
Where did Chris go? He had bought an airplane ticket that morning. He
had a bank account, drawers full of clothes, and shelves full of
books. He was a real, live person, occupying time and space on this
planet, and now suddenly where was he gone to? Did he go up the stack
at the crematorium? Was he in the little box of bones they handed
back? Was he strumming a harp of gold on some overhead cloud? None of
these answers made any sense.
It had to be asked: What was it I was so attached to? Is it just
something in the imagination? When you have done time in a mental
hospital, that is never a trivial question. If he wasn't just
imaginary, then where did he go? Do real things just disappear like
that? If they do, then the conservation laws of physics are in
trouble. But if we stay with the laws of physics, then the Chris that
disappeared was unreal. Round and round and round. He used to run off
like that just to make me mad. Sooner or later he would always
appear, but where would he appear now? After all, really, where did he go?
The loops eventually stopped at the realization that before it could
be asked "Where did he go?" it must be asked "What is the 'he' that
is gone?" There is an old cultural habit of thinking of people as
primarily something material, as flesh and blood. As long as this
idea held, there was no solution. The oxides of Chris's flesh and
blood did, of course, go up the stack at the crematorium. But they
weren't Chris.
What had to be seen was that the Chris I missed so badly was not an
object but a pattern, and that although the pattern included the
flesh and blood of Chris, that was not all there was to it. The
pattern was larger than Chris and myself, and related us in ways that
neither of us understood completely and neither of us was in complete
control of.
Now Chris's body, which was a part of that larger pattern, was gone.
But the larger pattern remained. A huge hole had been torn out of the
center of it, and that was what caused all the heartache. The pattern
was looking for something to attach to and couldn't find anything.
That's probably why grieving people feel such attachment to cemetery
headstones and any material property or representation of the
deceased. The pattern is trying to hang on to its own existence by
finding some new material thing to center itself upon." (Pirsig, ZMM Afterward)
Arlo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list